sexualised or desexualised?

Sexualised images of men in fashion branding leads to stereotyping of gay men...that is the question.
So does images of scantly dressed, hot, young hunks frolicking on the beach empower or disempower the gay man?

gay branding

that the fine line between gay and straight imagery in branding is blurred or does not exist anymore. When did it exist? It once was like this but has now changed. When did it change?and why did it change?

define

define homosexually or being gay...or suggest how you can qualify or label something to be gay.
in my opinion gay is no longer as easy as just a label or a way of living
things have changed--

now if you dress in a skirt or wear a bright pink tshirt, are you gay? how shallow could people be to label you purely on dress sense.maybe your mother is related to coco chanel?

so now do you define gay or gayness? and then more importantly how do you influence peoples opinion on it?

how gay is gay?

how would u describe gay ads?
when is it purely to shock and when is it to gain entrance to a gay market?

how relevant is homosexual imagery in fashion branding?

if you think of your favorite fashion brands how relevant would it be for them to use homosexual imagery?is it mutually beneficial to only the gay market or for everyone interested in fashion?